abstract engineer blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Battle: Los Angeles is a Battle to believe in

Posted on 13:17 by hony
I don't even need to see this movie to write a review of it. Here's what happens: UFOs are increasingly sighted. Suddenly the aliens emerge from where they were hiding amongst us this whole time. We fight a desperate battle and in the end win a bold, explosion-filled defiance of logic.
Even if this doesn't happen...even if the aliens win...movies of alien invasions involving huge epic battles and explosions leave me bored and my eyes hurting from too much rolling.


Imagine we were the aliens. What technologies would we need to reach another planet? Some sort of interstellar drive. Huge amounts of resources. Possible artificial gravity technology.
Let's imagine our telescope technology were to advance far enough that we could "discover" habitable alien worlds. We observe that lights exist on these alien worlds, lights that were emitted from those worlds only a few dozen light years ago. We've developed FTL traveling capabilities because we essentially can harness the energy of a star. We've developed the ability to capture and harness antimatter. We have quantum computing. Our biological bodies have been enhanced both genetically as well as through electronic implants.

So one of our scientists points out that the alien ecosystem might cause us a problem if we visit. So we send a probe first, to capture some of their microbes and learn about their biological makeup. From this, we develop antibodies and/or suits to protect us from their environment. Sorry, War of the Worlds.
Next, a general of our Pan-Global Military Alliance suggests the aliens might be hostile. So we package our own microbes into biological weapons that would simply release seemingly harmless e. coli bacteria on a completely defenseless biosphere. The aliens would have no defense, as our super-advanced orbital bombardment technology could spread the bacteria across their globe in seconds. But just in case they were capable of immune resistance to us...and all the germs we carry with us...we repurpose our Dyson-ring technology as a method to block their own star's light, which would render their planet a lifeless ice ball in weeks.

Look, I could really go on. The point is the technological divide an alien species would have over us would be similar to the one we have over chimpanzees, and therefore these pitched battles involving cool explosions and tragic protagonist deaths only cheapen the genre of science fiction.

Have you noticed that not once in the ST:TOS (Star Trek Kirk Era) and ST:TNG (Star Trek Picard Era) does an advanced civilization invade and conquer a pre-Warp civilization? Or at least it is not a recurring theme, if it does exist in various single serving episodes. The reason for this is that true science fiction writers realize that pitched, lopsided battles between two intelligent species cannot logically happen. One species would be so far advanced of the other that orbital bombardment (either of thermonuclear weapons or bio/chem weapons) would be the cheapest and simplest method to rid a planet of its occupants. Such a thing happens quite frequently in the ST universe, for example in the movie Star Trek: First Contact: the Borg travel back in time to Earth and bombard it from the atmosphere in order to prevent the humans from achieving warp capability.
Furthermore, any alien species sufficiently advanced to reach Earth and wreak havoc would have studied the planet well enough to realize if Earth's biosphere could harm them. Sorry, Signs.

So there are really two scenarios for First Contact with aliens. In the first scenario the aliens bombard us from outer space and wipe out our biosphere. This is because they perceive us as a threat to their current or future status in the galaxy, and destroying our civilization would be low risk/low return in comparison to contact and possible trade and economic ties.
The second scenario is just the opposite. The aliens contact us from outer space and set up a trade partnership with us because they have learned that humans are uniquely good in the known galaxy at being consumers.


_
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 5 Years
    Five years ago tomorrow I started this blog. I was working at a job I didn't particularly like nor found mentally fulfilling, and the bl...
  • This Tesla Love-Fest Has Got To End
    Over at The Oatmeal, a popular online comic, there's a sprawling, gushing graphic about Nikola Tesla. Inside it, Edison is referred to ...
  • I promise to stop writing about STEM soon. Just not yet.
    Imagine you are a tech company that makes widgets. You've gotten a factory in China to make the parts for the widgets for a tiny amount....
  • A Single Button
    When your grandchildren see F-35 fighter jets streaking through the skies above our fair country, probably at air shows and hopefully not ...
  • The Worst Science Idea of 2010 - Genspace Now Open For Disaster
    Here's the idea : Let's build a lab where anyone, literally anyone, can come and tinker with microorganisms. Better yet, let's m...
  • Hack The Body
    I have a short lunch today so I must be brief, but I wanted to point to these two articles, both published today: Monkey controls robot hand...
  • Where is the artificial gravity research?
    Just asking. _
  • TAE's DIY Iron Man Arc Reactor
    So I got the itch to create. With Halloween coming up, and the Iron Man 2 DVD release last week, I felt compelled to finally get off my hind...
  • Climate Science vs. Climate Economics
    Maybe you are getting tired of the climate ranting I'm doing. If so, here's David Roberts : Or contemplate this: To reach even the m...
  • Zomney
    For those of you who don't know who Joss Whedon is, he most recently directed The Avengers. _

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (41)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2012 (91)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2011 (205)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ▼  March (24)
      • More on Obama's Energy Speech
      • Quote for the Day - Revisionist History Edition
      • List of Bad Ideas, Day 2,158
      • Infinite Free Energy Reported...But Not Found
      • Greed and Growth at War With Each Other, Ctd
      • Greed and Growth at War With Each Other
      • The Abstracted Gymnast
      • An Ingenius, Flawed Plan
      • Kindle and the end of the "book era"
      • What We Can Do
      • Successful Drones vs. Failed Savants
      • Military Bashing
      • The Problem With Using "Decile" Divisions
      • Live Like Me Syndrome
      • From the Annals of Hypocrisy
      • How You Are Helping the Terrorists With Each and E...
      • Hey Jonah, Why the Apparent Contradiction?
      • Nuclear Fission Fusion
      • Battle: Los Angeles is a Battle to believe in
      • Kindle 3G
      • In which I argue by analogy that we MUST raise taxes
      • NASA evisceration of the day
      • Bleeding Heart Libertarians
      • The Oracle of Omaha is a fitting name.
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2010 (163)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (28)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

hony
View my complete profile