abstract engineer blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

DARPA and the Human Machine Interface

Posted on 08:27 by hony
In a BAA released yesterday, DARPA announced their Reliable Peripheral Interfaces (RPI) program:
DARPA seeks to develop reliable in-vivo peripheral motor-signal recording and sensory-signal stimulating interfaces. Such efforts will involve design, fabrication, testing, and analysis of new materials and technologies to demonstrate substantial improvements in reliability and quantity of peripheral motor-signal information. Ultimately DARPA desires to develop clinically viable technologies, enabling wounded service members to control state-of-the-art prosthetic limbs.
Here's the good stuff:
Technical Area 1: Demonstrate clinically viable reliable-tissue interfaces to peripheral nerves or muscles. These interfaces must enable stable, robust, and high-performance recording of motor-signal activity.

Technical Area 2: Demonstrate the clinically viable tissue-interface electronics necessary to enable the development and testing of reliable peripheral interfaces designed to control many-DOF prosthetic limbs.

Technical Area 3: Demonstrate clinically viable algorithms and subsystem for reliably decoding motor-control signals from detected peripheral signals.
How ironic this BAA releases in TAE's Year of the Human-Machine Interface! What was it I said? Oh yes. "All you need is drivers." That would be technical area 3. I wrote, in a previous blog post about hijacking the nervous system, that you could essentially read and write all five senses if you found a way to directly interface with the nervous system. That would be Technical area 1. And here, in February, I discuss the idea that electronics that integrate with the human nervous system could revolutionize information retrieval. That would be technical area 2.
So don't worry, DARPA, I've got you covered.

Seriously, though, this is good research. While it is probably impossible for most federal agencies to get ridiculous research funded, not so for DARPA. However, by cloaking what I really think is their ultimate goal: cyborg soldiers, behind a veil of beneficent "help the walking wounded" research, they can really kill two birds with one stone. Sure, they want to have prostheses that are more actively and reliably responsive to the actual neural commands of the amputee. That would be fantastic if concepts like Dean Kamen's "DEKA" arm could have better musculoneural feedback. Or the RIC arm could have a better interface than pectoral stimulation.
However, what would be even better would be if a soldier could plug into a supersuit and control it with his muscles directly, and receive external information, like ally/enemy positions via integrated electronics. He could control targeting systems with his nerves directly, without moving. He could send vocal commands and feedback to his teammates via radio...without speaking into a radio. He could plug himself into a USB port at the end of a mission and download his memories of the mission as a high-tech version of a mission report.

While I really laud DARPA for funding this research to help injured vets, what I really feel could be the bread and butter here would be breaking the code of human nerve to digital electronics communication. That would revolutionize and open up a whole new frontier in bionic interfacing. Sign me up.


_
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • In which I criticize the antiquated feelings of Ye Olde Mechanikal Engineer
    In a Lawrence Journal World blog, Dave Klamet writes about changing trends in education, especially the increasing competitiveness of non-A...
  • The End of an Era
    Last night, the beginning of the end of the laptop officially began . Sure the iPad has been around...but with nearly 30 tablets debuting at...
  • Inadvertant Great Idea
    The "@" symbol was included on the typewriter in 1885, and remained the least used key on the board until 1971, when Ray Tomlinson...
  • I promise to stop writing about STEM soon. Just not yet.
    Imagine you are a tech company that makes widgets. You've gotten a factory in China to make the parts for the widgets for a tiny amount....
  • Schadenfreude
    Ran into a kid that bullied me from elementary school all the way up through my junior year of high school. He's really fat now, and dri...
  • The Worst Science Idea of 2010 - Genspace Now Open For Disaster
    Here's the idea : Let's build a lab where anyone, literally anyone, can come and tinker with microorganisms. Better yet, let's m...
  • Ross Vs. Gay Marriage
    Listening to Ross Douthat (a Catholic) try to explain that the institution of marriage will be damaged by allowing gays to marry just seems...
  • If A, Then B
    WSJ Headline 1: Math, Science Popular Until Students Realize They’re Hard  WSJ Headline 2: To Follow the Money, Study Engineering  The concl...
  • Evolutionary Politics
    If President Obama is reelected I see a clear example of specialization-elimination in effect here. Let's say each of the GOP primary ca...
  • Engineers vs. Druids
    Paul Saffo, at Edge.org (scroll way down): There are two kinds of fools: one who says this is old and therefore good, and the other who say...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (41)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2012 (91)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (205)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2010 (163)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ▼  October (23)
      • Why My Marriage Works
      • DARPA and the Human Machine Interface
      • Electric Vehicles
      • Marketing the iPad rival
      • Adventures in Rare Metal Supereconomics
      • Steve Jobs' Logic Adventures
      • nom nom._
      • Adventures in Airport Security
      • Brain-Mounted Computers/Active Contact Lens Displays
      • TAE's Official List of Things Smart People Should ...
      • Quote of the Day 2
      • Quote of the Day
      • Pardon my french, Mom...but...
      • Cars that Drive Themselves, Ctd - Momentum Builds
      • Cars that Drive Themselves, Ctd - In Awe of Google
      • Water Ice in asteroids
      • 10 Years of Andrew Sullivan
      • Genetically Engineered High School Diplomas
      • TAE's DIY Iron Man Arc Reactor
      • High School Reunions
      • How can there be experts?
      • TAE, Evangelical Scientist
      • Don't Tread On Me
    • ►  September (28)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

hony
View my complete profile